petermaize

Life IS a dress rehearsal

Archive for the month “January, 2017”

Sunsets, talking snowmen and the rest of the universe

When I was a boy, we would spend summers at my grandmother’s house in Maryland. She lived on a river that fed the Chesapeake Bay. There were hidden coves and winding inlets that I could explore in a motorboat, and I spent hours on the river pretending I was a pirate or a commando or an explorer.

But some afternoons I preferred to sit at my grandmother’s typewriter and work on a story that I had thought up: it was about Super Pupil, a grade school superhero whose sidekick was a dog. I sent them on humorous adventures and enjoyed tapping out little stories painstakingly on the typewriter.

My grandmother was perplexed that a 10-year-old boy would want to sit inside writing instead of being outside playing. The best explanation that I could offer was that I liked to write. My early attempts at literature featured talking snowmen and goofy storylines, so it wasn’t as if I was motivated by a need to enlighten an audience. I just liked to write.

My family didn’t view my unusual hobby as the first steps toward a literary future. When my grandmother read the typewritten pages that I proudly but shyly offered her (my first reader!), she chuckled. Success! But then her comment revealed the source of her amusement.

“These typos are precious!” she laughed.

Rejection, misunderstanding and valid criticism are inevitable components of a writer’s life. Even as a journalist I was offended by the heavy-handed and arbitrary (I thought) edits of a news director. And those were just news stories: factual and straightforward. Sure, I tried to make them interesting. But the subject of those stories came from crime scenes, political conflicts or natural disasters–not my own head, and my own heart.

These days, although I can still agree with the 10-year-old and say that I like to write, there is something else that motivates me. This is true with most writers. They have to write. It is as if there is something taking place in the universe that needs to be revealed. Usually the revelation is a small one: just a glimpse of life that other people can relate to. Sometimes it’s an insight. Only occasionally is it a profound truth. We risk disapproval, disappointment and disdain in order to publish the slimmest of stories.

But even mediocre writing (been there, done that) is a reflection of a story that is constantly unfolding and needs to be told. How many sunset pictures does the world need? There’s another one every day. Some are gorgeous; most are just “nice”. But we watch the sunset and take photos, too. We participate in the event. If the sunset is particularly memorable, we share the photos with friends.

Do we have to take pictures of a sunset? Do we have to share a moment or an insight or a small reflection of the wonder and turbulence of the universe? Yes, we do.

 

 

 

 

 

There are No Miracles

The Enlightenment contributed much to Western culture, and spurred an era of unprecedented discovery and development.

It also contributed the concept that reason alone is capable of explaining everything that happens in the world, and that a scientific reason for all phenomena can always be found. Over time, this viewpoint mutated into the idea that there is no place for God in the ‘real’ world. Science can explain everything; there is nothing other than the material world in which we live.

Back in the 19th century, and indeed through most of the 20th century, it seemed that this viewpoint was valid: science continually discovered and described the workings of the universe, both minute and cosmic. It seemed that all of the answers were being discovered, one at a time–and it would be only a matter of time before we had a perfect picture of the universe, how it started and how it works.  Then the old stories of God  creating the universe and regularly intervening in it could be relegated to the realm of myth and fantasy.

But funny things kept happening, despite this rational worldview:

  • in China, a country where atheism had been promoted  for decades and religion had been suppressed, more than 100 million people embraced Christianity in the space of 30 years; reports of miracles abounded
  • Scientists discovered that the more they examined the universe, the more it looked like it had been hand-crafted on purpose
  • Miracles kept happening, and science had no explanation for them.

Now, I’m talking about miracles where experts can’t offer logical explanations–not cases where a statue cries or the image of Jesus appears in a waffle. Below are several cases where medical experts admit there are no plausible explanations for the cures that took place. The most famous of these is probably the story of Marlene Klepees, who was treated at the prestigious Mayo Clinic for cerebral palsy. Now, there is no cure for cerebral palsy. It slowly debilitates and kills its victims. But Marlene was miraculously cured of the affliction after it had reduced her to a quadriplegic. Today she is healthy with no signs of cerebral palsy. If the Mayo Clinic disputed her story, no doubt they would have spoken out, because their reputation is on the line. But they didn’t, because the story is true. To make this story more outlandish to atheistic ears, Marlene received a vision that she would be cured.

 

These are just a few examples of miracles. They’ve been happening everyday since, well, forever. In the Bible, they are referred to as signs and wonders. The Greek word for miracles is signs. Signs point you toward something. Miracles are abundant, and to us, random. They point to the eternal intervening in the material world. And as I said, they are happening everyday.

Like in Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. Millions of people have gotten sober by following AA’s Twelve Steps. Boiled down into a sentence, you get sober by admitting you are powerless over alcohol and then asking a Higher Power to remove the obsession from your life. And God does. If you are willing, then the insurmountable urge to debilitate and drown yourself with alcohol is taken away.

Sounds too simple to be true, right? But for 80 years that’s how it’s worked. The newly-sober addicts aren’t expected to become Christians, but they are encouraged to develop and maintain “conscious contact” with their higher power.

How does this work? The scientific community has advanced many explanations, because the scientific community usually has many conflicting explanations for anything that involves the human mind. Psychiatrists, behavioral psychologists, anthropologists, and lots of other ologists weigh in on issues from love to altruism to near-death experiences, each with their own explanation. Explanations grounded in science, and conjecture.

They just won’t use the word miracle. But if you’ve ever met a hardcore atheist who is drinking himself to death and then in a matter of weeks has seen his craving for alcohol disappear, you might be forgiven for using the word.

If you start with a pre-existing belief that miracles can’t happen because they don’t match your world view, you will constantly find reasons to ignore, refute or reject evidence of miracles. But they will keep on happening without you.

 

 

 

 

“But Christians Have Done So much Bad Stuff…”

Yesterday, under the title What Kind of Atheist Are You?, I mentioned the unthinking assumption held by many atheists that somehow science has proven that Christianity is untrue. Actually, physicists and cosmologists are facing the disconcerting challenge of either admitting that the universe appears to have been designed and fine-tuned by a supernatural power, or accepting that their goal of finding a Theory of Everything is futile (because, in their refusal to accept the possibility that God exists, they must believe in multiverses).

Here’s a recent article that explains their conundrum, written by an atheist who acknowledges the astounding level of fine-tuning in the universe while lamenting the fact that “there is no hope of explaining our universe’s features in terms of fundamental causes and principles.” That is “according to the current thinking of many physicists”–all of whom, one would assume, refuse to accept the most obvious conclusion: God made the universe this way, Big Bang and all.

http://harpers.org/archive/2011/12/the-accidental-universe/6/

But people who prefer to believe that there is no God can fall back on any number of other rationales to explain their decision. One that requires the least scientific or biblical knowledge is the well-known litany of abuses, transgressions and mayhem that Christians have carried out in the name of their Lord. Some of the most vocal and popular atheists, such as Dawkins and Hitchens, love this theme.

I will pause to mention that by far the most deadly and horrific crimes against humanity took place in the 20th century in the service of two causes that rejected Christianity: Communism and Nazism (no, Hitler was not a Christian–see note below). Mao and Stalin alone killed many more people in their attempts to forge a pure form of Communism than all Christian despots did over the centuries.

There is certainly a long list of atrocities committed in the name of Christianity, from colonization to religious wars to persecutions. The important thing to remember is that these acts violated the teachings of Jesus. That’s very clear.

The fact that ambitious or misguided kings and clergy perpetrated violent and oppressive acts doesn’t negate the core doctrines of Christianity. Please re-read the Sermon on the Mount if there is any question about this. Jesus would not torture, nor condone torture. So rejecting his teachings because some of his self-professed followers committed crimes is similar to rejecting the concept of democracy because elections in Uganda are rigged, or because Vladimir Putin perpetuates a mockery of democracy in order to retain power.

No one is suggesting that we get rid of democracy because it is so often perverted, tarnished or trampled. Because we “believe” in democracy.

 

Note: The Nazi Minister for Church Affairs, explained “Positive Christianity” as not “dependent upon the Apostle’s Creed“, nor in “faith in Christ as the son of God”, upon which Christianity relied, but rather, as being represented by the Nazi Party, saying “The Fuehrer is the herald of a new revelation”: William L. Shirer (1960). The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. London: Secker & Warburg. pp. 238–39

 

 

Post Navigation